針對GRE寫作考生普遍分?jǐn)?shù)偏低的建議
新GRE寫作分?jǐn)?shù)上不來怎么辦?很多參加GRE考試的同學(xué)都會有這個(gè)疑問，下面小編就這個(gè)問題給出了幾點(diǎn)建議。
針對GRE寫作考生普遍分?jǐn)?shù)偏低的建議
解決新GRE寫作分?jǐn)?shù)低的幾條建議：
1.有的放矢，充分準(zhǔn)備。在備考新GRE作文過程中要多準(zhǔn)備例子，并把它們一一寫下來，進(jìn)行分類。一個(gè)例子往往可以應(yīng)對好幾個(gè)同類的題目，這樣做是效率最高的辦法。
2.萬事開頭難，邁出第一步。我們都害怕寫新GRE作文，想到要練習(xí)寫一整篇文章，往往就沒有了信心。其實(shí)我們可以從練習(xí)寫作開頭段，然后設(shè)計(jì)文章的提綱開始。寫開頭段能夠讓我們以輕松一點(diǎn)的心情著手新GRE寫作的準(zhǔn)備，并且迅速了解所有的題目，因?yàn)镚RE考試的題目數(shù)量是固定的。儲備積極詞匯，用時(shí)得心應(yīng)手。從備考的開始就要著手增加working vocabulary, 當(dāng)然也包含詞組，成語。平時(shí)背的詞匯往往只是看到它能知道其中文的某個(gè)翻譯意思，但是我們卻不能靈活運(yùn)用這些詞匯進(jìn)行表達(dá)，更不用說在短暫的GRE寫作考試時(shí)間內(nèi)用它們遣詞造句了。
GRE優(yōu)秀范文賞析：思想家
GRE寫作題目：
Most societies do not take their greatest thinkers seriously，even when they claim to admire them.
大多數(shù)社會都沒把最偉大的思想家當(dāng)回事，雖然有時(shí)候這些社會自稱是求才若渴的。
GRE寫作范文：
In this busy，packed and dull world，people's most important concerning is how to make a living. They work assiduously to make money，to support their family，to purchase houses and cars. Hardly one common individual knows who their greatest thinkers are，not mention to take them seriously. Admittedly，in some cases，people claim that they admire the greatest thinkers; however，they actually know little about what the greatest thinkers' thoughts are. The fact is，in history of human civilizations，most societies do not take their greatest thinkers seriously，even when the greatest thinkers are seemed to be respected.
Generally，whatever societies the greatest thinkers are in，they have similar characteristics，such as high intelligence，eccentric temperament，wide range of knowledge，and the most essential one： the deeply and often predicted thoughts，which is the product of real wisdom. On one hand，it is the thoughts that distinguish the greatest thinkers from the mass. On the other hand，it is also the thoughts，however correct and predicted，which cause these elites out of the mass' sights and put them into an embarrassment in which few can understand them and their thoughts. A proper example is the passional German philosopher and poet Nietzche. Nietzche is a pioneer，whose profound exploration in philosophy influenced the descendants deeply. Yet his life is miserable and full of tragedies. Without money and job，Nietzche lived an impoverished life， which along with loneliness defeated him at last： he became insane when 45，and died 10 years later. Until that time，almost no one knew him or his thoughts. Even today，many people including some scholars call him mad philosopher.
In some worse cases，the greatest thinkers are even persecuted by their societies since the greatest thinkers always tend to have skeptical and critical thoughts，which the manipulators fear mostly and manipulated reluctant to accept. The reason is that once the advanced ideas，which are against the old ones，are accepted by mass，the domination or the present social system will in the danger of collapse. And at the same times，most people are reluctant to admit that what they believe in or cherish，however，always prejudice and rigid ideas set in people's minds beforehand，are not the truth but falsehood or illusions. A case in point is the great astronomer Copernicus，who developed the theory that the earth and other planets revolve around the sun. Although the theory was the most advanced astronomy theory in that time，it hadn't come out of press until the year before Copernicus' death because of mass being strongly against it especially the powerful churches，which were afraid that such a theory would shake authority of theology.
GRE優(yōu)秀范文賞析：權(quán)威問題
GRE寫作題目：
Much of the information that people assume is‘factual’actually turns out to be inaccurate. Thus，any piece of information referred to as a‘fact’should be mistrusted since it may well be proven false in the future.
大多數(shù)人們認(rèn)為是事實(shí)的信息結(jié)果實(shí)際上都是不準(zhǔn)確的。因此，任何據(jù)稱是事實(shí)的信息都應(yīng)該被質(zhì)疑，因?yàn)樗趯砗芸赡軙蛔C明為是錯(cuò)誤的。
GRE寫作范文：
Should we be doubtful to all the information at hands because the rightness of which is uncertain? The speaker claims so，I concede that people often commit various fallacies in the course of cognizing things，however I fundamentally take exception of the arguer's assertion to mistrust every fact we might encounter. And I will substantially discuss my views thereinafter.
To begin with，the speaker seems to implicate that a fact would be proven false in the future under numerous circumstance. Nevertheless I prefer to arguer that facts never change. No matter how did the Medieval Church and Inquisition persecute Bruno，the fact never changes that the earth is far from being the center of the universe as the religious sovereigns had assumed or hoped for，while just a minor particle in it. Equally，no matter how Edison had tried to incite the public fear and distrust to the alternative current electricity，the fact never changes that Teals’ electrical system is vastly superior to his direct current electrical one，and would be accepted and applied in larger range.
However，what do change are the human's objective interpretations to facts. One compelling argument to this point is that，due to the limitation of human’s knowledge and comprehensive capability，they tend to make insufficient or even false understanding to the certain fact. An apt illustration is the changes of
cognition to disease. While at the ancient time，our progenitors believed the a man becoming a patient for the reason that he had conduct crimes or offended some ghosts or spirits，the contemporary people have well know that the varies of pathogens are the basic causes to our diseases，and the defects of our immune system and so forth are also the factors as well. Another argument for the change of comprehension to fact is that different people always observe and interpret from different perspectives. Though the Relativity theory is not well compliable with the Quantum mechanism，no one call the greatness of both Einstein and Bohr，because their theories are based on distinct views，the former from the macrocosm and the later from the microcosm.
Notwithstanding the foregoing reasons for that human tend to make fallacies during the cause of comprehending and cognizing facts，these reasons should never be the excuses to doubt every conclusion we might draw from facts. Based on certain rational inference and proper knowledge fundament，the conclusions we make might well be justifiable，if not completely right，to certain degree. What we need to do is to promote the enterprise of pursuing the better answer and try to use the result we have get to application，instead of wasting our time to undue doubt and suspicion. Though the medical scientists have not fully understood the mechanism of how the does the implanted organ interact with the wounded body，they are not refrain from using the implanting skill to save patients，of course the precondition or which is that this technology is much well established than the fundamental theory.
RE經(jīng)典寫作范文：新創(chuàng)意
題目：
Truly innovative ideas do not arise from groups of people, but from individuals.When groups try to be creative, the members force each other to compromise and, as a result, creative ideas tend to be weakened and made more conventional. Most original ideas arise from individuals working alone.
真正有創(chuàng)意的想法并非來自于群體而是來自于個(gè)人。當(dāng)群體試圖創(chuàng)新的時(shí)候，它的成員之間會被迫相互妥協(xié)，結(jié)果就是新想法趨于弱化而更接近于傳統(tǒng)。大部分新想法都是來自于獨(dú)立工作的個(gè)人。
正文：
I agree with the speaker on that truly innovative ideas arise from individuals.Nevertheless, it is unfair to claim unilaterally that the groups tend to weaken creative ideas without thinking of their positive effects on the ideas; it is equally important for groups to examine, modify, or even reject the ideas.
First of all, truly innovative ideas are destined to arise from individuals in that inter-personal thinking process is so far impossible. This is to say, when we sit still and have a cluster of phenomena, theories, statistics and so forth of a certain issue in our mind, we are thinking it over yet with no assistance at all. After all it is impossible for one to intrude into other's mind. Following this principle, innovative ideas spark off during the process of meditation, and they are the produced by one's own effort. It is equally possible, however, for people to be inspired by each other, yet this is by no means assistance in thinking. Clues, hints, inspirations are to remind people of things ignored or taken for granted, but have nothing to do with the process of thinking, that is, to sort out the whole vision and draw conclusion. In one word, innovative ideas arise from meditation, which is solely limited within one body, one brain. Therefore innovative ideas are always the product of individual's work.
針對GRE寫作考生普遍分?jǐn)?shù)偏低的建議相關(guān)文章：
★ 為什么我的GRE作文只有3分?突破寫作分?jǐn)?shù)瓶頸你需要先解決這些問題