新GRE作文字?jǐn)?shù)要求是什么?3大角度為你揭秘
新GRE作文考試，雖然對(duì)于文章的字?jǐn)?shù)并沒有提出具體的字?jǐn)?shù)要求，但在保證文章質(zhì)量的前提下，多少字?jǐn)?shù)比較適合是大家都十分關(guān)心的問題，本文就GRE作文要求的兩種作文類型分別介紹字?jǐn)?shù)要求。
新GRE作文字?jǐn)?shù)要求是什么?3大角度為你揭秘
新GRE ISSUE作文字?jǐn)?shù)要求
字?jǐn)?shù)問題，太少的文章勢必低分，因?yàn)樽謹(jǐn)?shù)太少，很難將一個(gè)問題闡述的非常清楚，尤其是ISSUE。按照考試經(jīng)驗(yàn)，550---650的ISSUE字?jǐn)?shù)往往最有效。而不是寫得越多越好。有些考生，文章寫得冗長無比，其實(shí)思路混亂，沒有邏輯性。這種文章，勢必低分。所以，ISSUE作文要拿到高分，關(guān)鍵還是要看文章的組織架構(gòu)是否合理，論點(diǎn)的展開是否恰當(dāng)，論證是否有力、到位。這些要求需要一定的字?jǐn)?shù)做保障，但不絕對(duì)。
新GRE ARGUMENT作文字?jǐn)?shù)要求
至于ARGUMENT，一般來說，字?jǐn)?shù)400以上基本就夠了。ARGU的關(guān)鍵是要能準(zhǔn)確的找出邏輯錯(cuò)誤，并恰當(dāng)?shù)慕o予反駁，重點(diǎn)還是在于內(nèi)容，把要說的觀點(diǎn)都寫清楚即可，字?jǐn)?shù)同樣不需要強(qiáng)求。
新GRE作文模板如何使用
熟悉模版，把模版的打字時(shí)間減少到最少，以節(jié)省自己構(gòu)思的時(shí)間。
把自己完整寫過的并且修改過多次的文章背熟。
進(jìn)一步潤色自己的文章，磨礪詞匯和語句，總結(jié)以備使用
過一遍題庫，再讓自己熟悉一下，看到題目自己在腦子里過一遍想法，最后確保自己每個(gè)題目都知道說什么，以免抽到低頻時(shí)無話可說，可以用?？架浖S機(jī)抽套題，然后寫一篇。
溫習(xí)模版，明確每套模版適用于什么情況。
以上就是關(guān)于GRE作文字?jǐn)?shù)的一些要求和經(jīng)驗(yàn)分享，希望大家在寫作時(shí)不要太過拘泥于字?jǐn)?shù)要求，努力寫出有內(nèi)容有思路的文章，取得高分。
GRE寫作滿分范文1
The?following?is?taken?from?a?memo?from?the?advertising?director?of?the?Silver?Screen?Movie?Production?Company.??
"According?to?a?recent?report?from?our?marketing?department,?fewer?people?attended?movies?produced?by?Silver?Screen?during?the?past?year?than?in?any?other?year.??And?yet?the?percentage?of?generally?favorable?comments?by?movie?reviewers?about?specific?Silver?Screen?movies?actually?increased?during?this?period.??Clearly,?the?contents?of?these?reviews?are?not?reaching?enough?of?our?prospective?viewers;?so?the?problem?lies?not?with?the?quality?of?our?movies?but?with?the?public's?lack?of?awareness?that?movies?of?good?quality?are?available.??Silver?Screen?should?therefore?spend?more?of?its?budget?next?year?on?reaching?the?public?through?advertising?and?less?on?producing?new?movies."??
The?argument?presented?above?is?relatively?sound,?however,?the?author?fails?to?recognize?all?the?elements?necessary?to?evaluate?his?situation.??The?idea?that?more?money?be?invested?in?advertising?may?be?a helpful?one,?but?perhaps?not?because?people?are?unaware?of?the?current?reviews.??To?clarify,?it?may?be?necessary?to?advertise?more?in?order?to?increase?sales,?however?that?could?be?due?to?many?circumstances?such?as?a?decrease?in?the?public's?overall?attendance,?an?increase?in?the?cost?of?movies,?or?a?lack?of?trust?in?the?opinions?of?the?reviewers.??
The?advertising?director?first?needs?to?determine?the?relative?proportion?of?movie?goers?that?choose?to?see?Silver?Screen?films.??That?will?help?him?to?understand?his?market?share.??If?the?population?in?general?is?attending?less,?then?he?may?still?be?out-profiting?his?competitors,?despite?his?individual?sales?decrease.??In?fact,?his?relative?sales?could?be?increasing.??Determining?where?he?stands?in?his?market?will?help?him?to?create?and?implement?an?action?plan.??
Another?important?thing?to?consder?is?the?relative?cost?of?attending?movies?to?the?current?standard?of?living.??If?the?standard?of?living?is?decreasing,?it?may?contribute?to?an?overall?decrease?in?attendance.??In?that?case,?advertising?could?be?very?helpful,?in?that?a?clever?campaign?could?emphasize?the?low?cost?of?movies?as?compared?to?many?other?leisure?activities.??This?could?offset?financial?anxieties?of?potential?customers.??
Finally,?it?is?important?to?remember?that?people?rarely?trust?movie?reviewers.??For?that?reason,?it?is?important?that?the?films?appeal?to?the?populus,?and?not?critics?alone.??The?best?advertisement?in?many?cases?is?word?of?mouth.??No?matter?what?critics?say,?people?tend?to?take?the?opinions?of?friends?more?seriously.??This?supports?continual?funding?to?produce?quality?movies?that?will?appeal?to?the?average?person.??
There?is?no?reason?that?silver?screen?should?not?spend?more?on?advertisement,?however,?there?is?reason?to?continue?to?invest?in?diverse,?quality?films.??Furthermore,?the?company?must?consider?carefully?what?it?chooses?to?emphasize?in?its?advertisement.??
Commentary??
Although?the?response?begins?by?stating?that?the?argument?"is?relatively?sound,"?it?immediately?goes?on?to?develop?a?critique.??The?response?identifies?three?major?flaws?in?the?argument?and?provides?a?careful?and?thorough?analysis.??The?main?points?discussed?are?that??
--?the?fall-off?in?attendance?might?be?industry?wide?
--?the?general?state?of?the?economy?might?have?affected?movie????attendance?
--?movie?goers?"rarely?trust?movie?reviewers"??
Each?of?these?points?is?developed;?together?they?are?presented?within?the?context?of?a?larger?idea:?that?while?spending?more?money?on?advertising?may?be?helpful,?the?company?should?"continue?to?invest?in?diverse,?quality?films."??
This?is?a?smoothly?written,?well-developed?analysis?in?which?syntactic?variety?and?the?excellent?use?of?transitions?make?for?a?virtually?seamless?response.??This?paper?clearly?merits?a?score?of?6.
GRE寫作滿分范文2
The?following?is?taken?from?a?memo?from?the?advertising?director?of?the?Silver?Screen?Movie?Production?Company.??
"According?to?a?recent?report?from?our?marketing?department,?fewer?people?attended?movies?produced?by?Silver?Screen?during?the?past?year?than?in?any?other?year.??And?yet?the?percentage?of?generally?favorable?comments?by?movie?reviewers?about?specific?Silver?Screen?movies?actually?increased?during?this?period.??Clearly,?the?contents?of?these?reviews?are?not?reaching?enough?of?our?prospective?viewers;?so?the?problem?lies?not?with?the?quality?of?our?movies?but?with?the?public's?lack?of?awareness?that?movies?of?good?quality?are?available.??Silver?Screen?should?therefore?spend?more?of?its?budget?next?year?on?reaching?the?public?through?advertising?and?less?on?producing?new?movies."??
The?advertising?director?of?Silver?Screen?should?lose?his?job.??It?is?clear?that?his?analysis?of?the?decrease?in?attendance?in?the?past?year?was?incomplete.??A?better?qualified?individual?might?have?explored?the?issue?further?by?doing?several?different?things.??First?of?all,?surveys?of?the?general?population?could?provide?a?clue?to?the?decreased?viewership.?They?may?find?that?people?aren't?as?willing?to?pay?the?high?prices?anymore.??A?survey?may?also?reveal?that?people?are?aware?of?Silver?Screen,?but?opt?not?to?see?the?films.??An?inspection?of?the?nature?of?the?films?made?by?Silver?Screen?could?also?hint?to?the?root?of?the?problem.??If?Silver?Screen?produces?a?lot?of?the?same?type?of?movie,?then?the?problem?may?be?that?they?don't?produce?enough?to?appeal?to?the?diverse?interests?of?the?population.??For?instance,??if?their?movies?typically?contain?excessive?violence?and?foul?language,?parents?won't?take?their?children?to?these?films.??That?is?a?significant?portion?of?the?potential?viewing?population?lost.??
The?ad?director?mentions?that?reviewers?liked?specific?films?and?gave?more??favorable?reviews?than?in?the?past.??But?he?neglects?to?mention?the?specific?numbers-?critics?may?have?raved?about?2?movies?and?turned?their?thumbs?down?the?10?others.??If?thats'?the?case,?it's?no?wonder?that?viewership?has?declined.??
Spending?more?on?advertising,?and?less?on?production,?as?the?ad?director?suggests,?could?drive?the?company?out?of?business.??If?the?media?builds?alot?of?hype?over?a?new?release?that?was?poorly?produced,?people?are?more?likely?to?be?disappointed,?and?skeptical?about?future?productions.??This?is?certainly?not?in?the?company's?best?interests.?What?is?in?the?company's?best?interest?is?a?broader?scope?of?the?problem,?and?different?approaches?to?solving?i??
Commentary??
This?strong?response?begins?with?an?attack?on?the?advertising?director?of?Silver?Screen?but?quickly?shifts?to?identifying?major?flaws?in?the?argument.??The?main?points?of?the?critique?are?that??
--?the?real?reasons?for?a?decline?in?viewership?have?not?yet?been????identified;?
--?Silver?Screen?may?not?produce?different?kinds?of?movies?to?appeal?to????diverse?interests;?
--?the?number?of?favorably?reviewed?movies?may?actually?have?been????very?low;?and?
--?spending?money?to?produce?a?possibly?poor?movie?could?hurt?rather than?help?the?company.??
Although?more?points?are?made?here?than?are?made?in?the?sample?6?response?on?this?topic,?each?of?the?points?made?in?the?6?paper?is?developed.??That?is?not?the?case?here.??In?this?response,?each?point?is?supported?(by?perhaps?an?additional?sentence),?but?it?is?not?further?developed.??The?paper?is?smoothly?organized?with?few?but?appropriate?transitions.??The?writing?is?strong?with?some?variety?in?syntax.??For?these?reasons,?this?response?earns?a?score?of?5.
GRE寫作滿分范文3
The?following?is?taken?from?a?memo?from?the?advertising?director?of?the?Silver?Screen?Movie?Production?Company.??
"According?to?a?recent?report?from?our?marketing?department,?fewer?people?attended?movies?produced?by?Silver?Screen?during?the?past?year?than?in?any?other?year.??And?yet?the?percentage?of?generally?favorable?comments?by?movie?reviewers?about?specific?Silver?Screen?movies?actually?increased?during?this?period.??Clearly,?the?contents?of?these?reviews?are?not?reaching?enough?of?our?prospective?viewers;?so?the?problem?lies?not?with?the?quality?of?our?movies?but?with?the?public's?lack?of?awareness?that?movies?of?good?quality?are?available.??Silver?Screen?should?therefore?spend?more?of?its?budget?next?year?on?reaching?the?public?through?advertising?and?less?on?producing?new?movies."??
Although?the?reasoning?in?this?arguement?is?logical,?the?writer?failed?to?consider?other?reasons?for?the?disparity?between?the?percentage?of?people?attending?the?company's?movie?and?the?percentage?of?favorable?reviews.??Perhaps?the?fault?lies?with?the?reviewers?and?not?the?production?company;?the?public?may?not?trust?the?critics'?reviews.??Another?posibility?for?the?attendance?drop?is?that?the?general?public?does?not?find?the?subject?matter?of?the?movies?enticing.??If?that?were?the?case,?spending?less?on?producing?new?movies?in?an?effort?to?re-direct?funds?to?advertising?could?backfire?by?further?limiting?the?types?of?movies?available?to?the?potential?audience.??Maybe?the?general?public?is?simply?not?impressed?with?the?critically-acclaimed?qualities?of?the?movies?(such?as?eloquent?screenplays,?artful?cinematography,?and?realistic?acting)?and?and?would?prefer?seeing?flashy?special?effects?and?big-name?stars.??The?possible?reasons?for?the?attendance?decline?are?numerous;?even?aspects?not?directly?related?to?the?movie?industry?(such?as?the?improving?quality?of?television?programming?and?the?increasing?popularity?of?home?computer?use)?may?play?large?roles.??The?company's?management?would?be?wise?to?consider?and?study?the?entire?realm?of?possibilities?before?making?drastic?changes?in?its?budget?based?on?one?statistical?discovery.??
Commentary??
This?response?identifies?and?analyzes?some?important?flaws?in?the?argument.??Although?the?number?of?points?mentioned?is?the?same?as?that?in?the?sample?5?paper,?this?response?remains?at?the?4?score?level?because?the?points?of?the?critique?are?only?minimally?developed?or?supported.??
The?essay?identifies?four?points:??
--?the?public?might?not?trust?critics?
--?the?movies'?subject?matter?might?not?be?appealing
--?the?public?might?prefer?seeing?special?effects?or?big-name?stars?rather????than?good?cinematography?or?realistic?acting?
--?perhaps?improvement?in?TV?programming?or?increased?use?of?home????computers?has?kept?people?away?from?movie?theaters??
Ideas?in?the?response?are?conveyed?well?and?clearly;?the?use?of?language?is?generally?strong.??But?the?paper's?"bare-bones"?analysis?gives?it?a?list-like?quality.??It?is?therefore?merely?adequate?and?merits?a?score?of?4.
新GRE作文字?jǐn)?shù)要求是什么?3大角度為你揭秘相關(guān)文章：